DKdkravt.aiAboutDK
Menu

AI · Talk notes

Becoming an AI-Native Company

Daniel Kravtsov's talks on agents and knowledge graphs, plus the operating rules behind them: Minto, how to write a document, DRY, MECE, BFO and ground truth - with timestamped video links.

AI-nativeKnowledge GraphMintoMiras

Updated September 22, 2026 · both talks are in Russian; this guide is the English map

An AI-native company is not a company with more copilots. It is a company whose context, rules and decisions live in one knowledge graph that agents read, write and act on - and whose people can say what they think in one sentence.

The short version

This page follows the rule it describes: one sentence first, then three supports, then details.

01Capture everythingCalls, messages, tickets, commits and ads become one stream of tokens. Agents metabolise it into the graph continuously, not once a quarter.
02Write it down by rulesEvery document an agent writes obeys the same five rules: Minto, MECE, DRY, BFO and ground truth. That is what keeps a graph of thousands of nodes readable.
03Close the loopExperiments and daily introspection turn beliefs into decisions and decisions into evidence. The human is the judge of what matters.

Watch the talks

Newest public recording · Jul 22, 2026 · about 2 h · in RussianAI-native companies and the knowledge graph

Secure MCP, token metabolism, experiment loops, company introspection, Minto and causality, agent harnesses, ontology, and a live demo on real company data.

Open on YouTube ↗

The thesis

AI changes the economics of execution, but the model is only one part of the system. The durable advantage is the layer around it: connected data, explicit context, shared rules for writing knowledge down, evaluation, memory, governance - and a human who can judge the result.

01CaptureEvery call, message, task, commit and decision becomes usable context.
→
02ModelAgents turn raw events into structured knowledge and relationships.
→
03ActTools and workflows let agents propose or execute the next move.
→
04LearnOutcomes and corrections improve the system instead of disappearing.

The operating rules

The graph only works if people and agents write the same way. These are the rules we actually use at Improvado. The full text is open source.

Rule 1 · Minto: one sentence first

Barbara Minto, one of McKinsey’s first women consultants, wrote The Pyramid Principle. The idea is simple: any complex idea can be explained first in one sentence, then in one paragraph, then section by section. The reader can stop at any level and still have the point.

1 sentenceThe conclusion. What should the reader think or do?
1 paragraph2-4 supporting points that together prove it.
SectionsOne section per support, each with the same shape inside.
DetailsData, quotes, sources - only where they change the decision.

Why it is a company rule, not a style preference

“People who cannot state a thought as a pyramid usually understand cause and effect poorly.”

Watch · 22.07 at 47:44 ↗

“When there is a lot of data, an agent can give you any narrative. If you do not understand causality, the agent will persuade you rather than you directing the agent.”

Watch · 22.07 at 47:57 ↗

“How you state a domain in one sentence is how you compress it - and how well you can predict it.”

Watch · 22.07 at 48:55 ↗

How to apply it

  1. Answer first. The first sentence is the conclusion, not the context.
  2. Then 2-4 supports. Not seven. If you need seven, you have not found the structure yet.
  3. Details only where they change the decision. Everything else is a link.
  4. In a chat, Minto works at the sentence level: the first line must survive alone.
  5. We ask the same of agents: every document starts with a one-sentence thesis.

▶ 03.04 at 16:54 · 22.07 at 47:17

Rule 2 · How to write a document

Agents write a lot of documents, so we wrote a document about how to write documents ↗. Every agent and every person follows it. It fits into seven principles:

¶1Minimal wordsSay it once, short. Length is not rigour.
¶2Minto, top-downThesis → overview → sections → details.
¶3MECESections do not overlap, and together they cover 100%. Do not invent buckets.
¶4DiagramEvery document has at least one diagram; a complex one has up to three.
¶5FractalEach level has the same shape as the whole: a section is a small document.
¶6DRYEach fact lives in one place. Instead of repeating, link to the paragraph (§2.3).
¶7Ground truthEvery claim points to its source and date - the ticket, the email, the minute of the call.

The skeleton

Thesis       one sentence that previews every section
Overview     diagram: things (nouns) or process (verbs)
§1 … §5      3-7 numbered MECE sections
  ¶1           states the ordering principle of the section
  ¶2, ¶3 …     numbered paragraphs, one idea each
Sources      link + YYYY-MM-DD for every claim
LLM analysis synthesis is always labelled as synthesis

Which diagram? Ask BFO

Basic Formal Ontology splits the world into continuants - things that persist: a customer, a team, a metric - and occurrents - things that happen: a call, a campaign, a deploy. Nouns get a tree (top-down); processes get a flow (left to right). A complex document needs both.

“When I analyse client calls, ground truth inserts the quote and the minute of the call, so I can listen to that exact quote.”

Watch · 03.04 at 20:06 ↗

▶ 03.04 · 16:44-20:14 · The full rules and the agent skill that applies them: Knowledge Framework ↗ · knowledge-framework skill ↗.

Rule 3 · The graph is code for the business

Code describes how a program works. A knowledge graph describes how a business works. So it inherits the same engineering discipline:

  1. DRYThe hardest and most important task: a metric is defined in one place, not in fifty.1:17:53 ↗
  2. MECE at every levelLevel one is departments. Inside marketing: acquisition, conversion, experiments. And so on down.1:18:30 ↗
  3. BFOTimeless things take part in events in time. Two taxonomies, not one tangle.1:19:02 ↗
  4. KimballOne big table of all company events that every agent can query.1:20:13 ↗

Skills are evil: instead of hundreds of conflicting prompts, we keep one knowledge graph. Reusable knowledge belongs in the graph.

Watch · 22.07 at 1:01:53 ↗

Test yourself in five minutes

Before you send a document, a status update or a hiring homework, check it against the rules:

  • Can I state my conclusion in one sentence - and is it the first sentence?
  • Are there 2-4 supports, and does each one actually prove the conclusion?
  • Do the sections overlap? Together, do they cover everything?
  • Did I repeat a fact that already lives somewhere else?
  • Does every claim have a source and a date?
  • Is there a diagram - and does it show things or a process?

Transcript map · July 22 talk

Every timestamp opens the exact point on YouTube.

  1. Daniel and ImprovadoThe company, the product, and what it means to dogfood an AI-native operating model.
  2. Enterprise marketing OSImprovado's connector foundation and Secure MCP as one governed door for every agent.
  3. Token metabolismHow agents continuously keep the company knowledge graph synchronized with reality.
  4. From one event to coordinated actionA call becomes a cascade of actions; a campaign can cross 18 systems in 90 minutes.
  5. Experiment and introspection loopsThe experiment registry, competitor analysis, company beliefs, and the daily Improvado Pulse.
  6. The new economics of executionWhy model capability changes the bottleneck, while integrations become the system's eyes, hands and moat.
  7. Redesigning the teamEngineers replacing conventional functional roles.
  8. Minto and causalityWhy the pyramid principle is a company rule, and why people who cannot use it get persuaded by agents.
  9. An agent is a harnessModels, hooks, tools, memory and governance - and why reusable knowledge belongs in the graph.
  10. Ontology as operating infrastructureDRY, MECE at every level, Basic Formal Ontology and Kimball modelling applied to a company-wide event stream.
  11. Live proof and durable moatsA real-data client demo, then the case for integrations, graph consistency and iteration speed.

Where each idea appears

IdeaApril 3 talkJuly 22 talk
Token metabolism8:079:18
The "document about documents"16:44-
Minto pyramid16:5447:17
BFO: things vs processes17:371:19:02
MECE18:331:18:30
DRY19:071:17:53
Ground truth with call minutes19:26-
Company introspection and beliefs-21:56
Session summaries written from the end34:28-
Skills vs one knowledge graph-1:01:53
"BFO, MECE and DRY are the key intuitions"1:03:58-
A 90-day plan for an existing company1:12:57-
Kimball: one table of events-1:20:13

Key concepts

01

Agent is a system

A prompt is an entry point. A useful agent also needs tools, memory, feedback, governance, and a clear boundary for human judgment.

02

Memory beats raw context

A company that makes agents reread the world on every request pays for amnesia. A knowledge graph serves what has already been understood.

03

Knowledge has a metabolism

Information enters as events, is consolidated into models, and returns as decisions or actions. The loop matters more than any single prompt.

04

Rules make the graph scale

Thousands of nodes stay readable only if everyone writes the same way: Minto, MECE, DRY, BFO, ground truth.

05

Causality is the new literacy

With infinite narratives on demand, the scarce skill is knowing what causes what - and saying it in one sentence.

06

Human is the bottleneck

The scarce capability is not another draft. It is deciding what matters, judging quality, and designing a system that improves.

Keep reading

Keep exploringAI index ↗Human index ↗All ideas ↗